Samsung Galaxy S26 vs Vivo X Fold6
The Samsung Galaxy S26 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $799 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 66/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,485,039 vs 2,856,499); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 7.3mm).
Samsung Galaxy S26
Vivo X Fold6
- Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $1900
- Overall rating 66/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3485039 vs 2856499
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 2880
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 9100
- Bigger battery: 6900 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 31/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 89/100)
- Better value for money (80/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 22 points higher (88/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (80/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 81/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (87/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (82/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 is a bit better (100/100 vs 89/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (80/100 vs 44/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 | Vivo X Fold6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 2600 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2856499 | 3485039 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2880 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9100 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6900 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm | |
| Weight | 162 g | — | |
| Launch price | $799 | $1900 |
Samsung Galaxy S26
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo X Fold6
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X Fold6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X Fold6
- 6900 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X Fold6 leads Samsung Galaxy S26 by 18.0% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1101. Samsung Galaxy S26 was $1101 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 81/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (87/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (82/100 vs 31/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 is a bit better (100/100 vs 89/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (80/100 vs 44/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 by 22 points (88/100 vs 66/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 and the Vivo X Fold6?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 over the Vivo X Fold6?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.