Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $2899 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 69/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 2,926,532); the Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably lighter (207g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 69/100
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 2926532
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 207g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $650 vs $2899
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 15 points higher (84/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (73/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 9287 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | $650 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 7.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2249. Vivo iQOO 13 was $2249 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (99/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (73/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.