Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $2899 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 69/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 2,926,532); the Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably lighter (207g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo iQOO 13
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 69/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 2926532
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 207g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $650 vs $2899
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 20/100)
- Better value for money (80/100 vs 42/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 15 points higher (84/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 63/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (80/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (73/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 20/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (80/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 3119308 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 9494 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 207 g | |
| Price | $2899 | $650 |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 6.2% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2249. Vivo iQOO 13 is cheaper by $2249.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (99/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (73/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 20/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (80/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.