Redmi Note 13 4G vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Redmi Note 13 4G (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $146 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 36/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 469,734); the Redmi Note 13 4G is noticeably lighter (188g vs 309g).
Redmi Note 13 4G
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Lighter: 188g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $146 vs $2899
- Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 469734
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 466
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 1396
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 41/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Redmi Note 13 4G vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 21 points higher (57/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G leads (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 4G (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (49/100 vs 41/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (65/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (100/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Redmi Note 13 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 469734 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 466 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1396 | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 162.3×75.6×8.0 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $146 | $2899 |
Redmi Note 13 4G
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Redmi Note 13 4G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 13 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Redmi Note 13 4G and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Redmi Note 13 4G by 83.9% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2753. Redmi Note 13 4G is cheaper by $2753.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 4G (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (49/100 vs 41/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (65/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (100/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Note 13 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 4G by 21 points (57/100 vs 36/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Redmi Note 13 4G has a MobileRank rating of 36/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 13 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 41/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 13 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 13 4G over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Redmi Note 13 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.