Redmi K100 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

The Redmi K100 Pro Max (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $730 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K100 Pro Max leads — 93/100 vs 69/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K100 Pro Max has the bigger battery (9070 mAh vs 5600); the Redmi K100 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,722,803 vs 2,926,532).

The Redmi K100 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 24 points (93/100 vs 69/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi K100 Pro Max

Performance 97
Display 91
Camera 90
Battery 95
Portability —
Value for money 100

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

Performance 90
Display 70
Camera 52
Battery 63
Portability 20
Value for money 46

What makes Redmi K100 Pro Max better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3722803 vs 2926532
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3013
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9287
  • Bigger battery: 9070 vs 5600 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $730 vs $2899

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 90/100)
  • Better camera (90/100 vs 52/100)
  • Longer battery life (95/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better display (91/100 vs 70/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?


  • Overall rating 69/100

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi K100 Pro Max vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Redmi K100 Pro Max scores 24 points higher (93/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K100 Pro Max leads (90/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K100 Pro Max leads (95/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Redmi K100 Pro Max — 100/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Redmi K100 Pro Max is a bit better (97/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K100 Pro Max notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (91/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K100 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (90/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K100 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (95/100 vs 63/100).

Redmi K100 Pro Max: The Redmi K100 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold: The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi K100 Pro Max Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 3722803 2926532
Geekbench Single 3639 3013
Geekbench Multi 11047 9287
Display 6.9" AMOLED 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1200x2608 2160x1584
Refresh rate 185 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 9070 mAh 5600 mAh
Charging 100W 45W
Wireless charging 50W 15W
Main camera 200 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 10 MP
Front camera 32 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 IP48
Dimensions — 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm
Weight — 309 g
Launch price $730 $2899

Camera comparison

Redmi K100 Pro Max

  • Main: 200MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
90
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
52
camera

Display comparison

Redmi K100 Pro Max

  • 6.9" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2608
  • Refresh rate: 185 Hz
91
display

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2160x1584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
70
display

Battery and charging

Redmi K100 Pro Max

  • 9070 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
95
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • 5600 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
63
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi K100 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi K100 Pro Max Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
93/100
3722803 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
69/100 -27.2%
2926532 AnTuTu

Redmi K100 Pro Max leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 27.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi K100 Pro Max

$730

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

$2899

Launch price difference: $2169. Redmi K100 Pro Max was $2169 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K100 Pro Max is a bit better (97/100 vs 90/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi K100 Pro Max notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (91/100 vs 70/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Redmi K100 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (90/100 vs 52/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K100 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (95/100 vs 63/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi K100 Pro Max or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Redmi K100 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 24 points (93/100 vs 69/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi K100 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Redmi K100 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 93/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi K100 Pro Max or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Redmi K100 Pro Max leads on camera score (90/100 vs 52/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi K100 Pro Max or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Redmi K100 Pro Max leads on performance (97/100 vs 90/100).

Should you choose the Redmi K100 Pro Max over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Redmi K100 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.