Redmi K90 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Redmi K90 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $401 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K90 leads — 68/100 vs 57/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K90 has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Redmi K90 is faster in AnTuTu (3,088,357 vs 2,926,532); the Redmi K90 is noticeably lighter (206g vs 309g).
Redmi K90
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Higher AnTuTu: 3088357 vs 2926532
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Lighter: 206g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $401 vs $2899
- Higher performance (69/100 vs 67/100)
- Better camera (53/100 vs 49/100)
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 52/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (42/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (82/100 vs 0/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 57/100
Comparing the Redmi K90 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Redmi K90 scores 11 points higher (68/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 leads (71/100 vs 52/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K90 leads (82/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (69/100 vs 67/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (53/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (71/100 vs 52/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi K90 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (42/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K90 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (82/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Redmi K90 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3088357 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3050 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9300 | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2510x1156 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7100 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×75.3×8.0 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 206 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $401 | $2899 |
Redmi K90
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Redmi K90
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2510x1156
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi K90
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Redmi K90 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi K90 leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 5.5% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2498. Redmi K90 is cheaper by $2498.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (69/100 vs 67/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (53/100 vs 49/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (71/100 vs 52/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi K90 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (42/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K90 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (82/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Redmi K90 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Redmi K90 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Redmi K90 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Redmi K90 has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Should you choose the Redmi K90 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Redmi K90 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.