Redmi Note 13 4G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
The Redmi Note 13 4G (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads — 78/100 vs 46/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,453,998 vs 476,175); the Redmi Note 13 4G is noticeably lighter (188g vs 215g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 13 4G
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
What makes Redmi Note 13 4G better?
- Lighter: 188g vs 215g
- Better display (79/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (67/100 vs 66/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3453998 vs 476175
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 466
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1396
- Faster charging: 60W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 34/100)
- Better camera (67/100 vs 44/100)
- Longer battery life (61/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Note 13 4G vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra scores 32 points higher (78/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (67/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 4G (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 4G (67/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 4G (61/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (67/100 vs 66/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 13 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 476175 | 3453998 | |
| Geekbench Single | 466 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1396 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1968x2184 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 60W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 162.3×75.6×8.0 mm | — | |
| Weight | 188 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2199 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 13 4G
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 13 4G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1968x2184
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 13 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Note 13 4G and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads Redmi Note 13 4G by 86.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 13 4G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 4G (96/100 vs 34/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 4G (67/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 4G (61/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (67/100 vs 66/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 13 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 4G by 32 points (78/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 13 4G has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 78/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 13 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on camera score (67/100 vs 44/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 13 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 34/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 13 4G over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.