Redmi Note 13 4G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
The Redmi Note 13 4G (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads — 75/100 vs 46/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Note 13 4G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,065,623 vs 476,175); the Redmi Note 13 4G is noticeably lighter (188g vs 215g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 13 4G
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
What makes Redmi Note 13 4G better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 33W vs 25W
- Lighter: 188g vs 215g
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (67/100 vs 66/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3065623 vs 476175
- Better Geekbench Single: 2910 vs 466
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9174 vs 1396
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 34/100)
- Better camera (76/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Note 13 4G vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 scores 29 points higher (75/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (91/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (76/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 4G (91/100 vs 34/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 4G (76/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (67/100 vs 66/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 13 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 476175 | 3065623 | |
| Geekbench Single | 466 | 2910 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1396 | 9174 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2184x1968 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4400 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 145 | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 162.3×75.6×8.0 mm | 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | — | $1999 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 13 4G
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 13 4G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2184x1968
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 13 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Note 13 4G and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads Redmi Note 13 4G by 84.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 13 4G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 4G (91/100 vs 34/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 4G (76/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (67/100 vs 66/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 13 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 4G by 29 points (75/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Redmi Note 13 4G has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 13 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 44/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 13 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on performance (91/100 vs 34/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 13 4G over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.