Redmi K90 Max vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

The Redmi K90 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $504 and $1999. Both devices score the same overall rating of 75/100. Key differences: the Redmi K90 Max has the bigger battery (8550 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Redmi K90 Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,760,662 vs 3,065,623); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is thinner (4.2mm vs 8.1mm).

Both devices scored the same rating of 75/100 — the choice comes down to your priorities.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi K90 Max

Performance 96
Display 94
Camera 37
Battery 78
Portability 41
Value for money 72

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

Performance 91
Display 78
Camera 76
Battery 39
Portability 66
Value for money 58

What makes Redmi K90 Max better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3760662 vs 3065623
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2910
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 9174
  • Bigger battery: 8550 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $504 vs $1999

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 91/100)
  • Longer battery life (78/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 78/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?

  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 215g vs 227g

  • Better camera (76/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 41/100)

Comparison verdict

The Redmi K90 Max and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 received the same MobileRank rating — 75/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (76/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Max leads (78/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Redmi K90 Max — 72/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 58/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Max is a bit better (96/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Max notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Redmi K90 Max (76/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (78/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Redmi K90 Max (66/100 vs 41/100).

Redmi K90 Max: The Redmi K90 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi K90 Max Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 3760662 3065623
Geekbench Single 3293 2910
Geekbench Multi 10243 9174
Display 6.8" AMOLED 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2772x1280 2184x1968
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 8550 mAh 4400 mAh
Charging 100W 25W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) — 145
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 20 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP66 IP48
Dimensions 162.9×77.9×8.1 mm 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm
Weight 227 g 215 g
Launch price $504 $1999

Camera comparison

Redmi K90 Max

  • Main: 50MP f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
76
camera

Display comparison

Redmi K90 Max

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1280
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2184x1968
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Battery and charging

Redmi K90 Max

  • 8550 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
78
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi K90 Max and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi K90 Max MediaTek Dimensity 9500
75/100
3760662 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
75/100 -22.7%
3065623 AnTuTu

Redmi K90 Max leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 by 22.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi K90 Max

$504

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

$1999

Launch price difference: $1495. Redmi K90 Max was $1495 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Max is a bit better (96/100 vs 91/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Max notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (94/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Redmi K90 Max (76/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (78/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Redmi K90 Max (66/100 vs 41/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi K90 Max or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

Both devices scored 75/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Redmi K90 Max (96/100 vs 91/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi K90 Max and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Redmi K90 Max has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 75/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi K90 Max or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi K90 Max or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Redmi K90 Max leads on performance (96/100 vs 91/100).

Should you choose the Redmi K90 Max over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Redmi K90 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.