Oppo Reno12 F 4G vs Redmi Note 13 4G
The Oppo Reno12 F 4G (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, while the Redmi Note 13 4G (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685. Both devices score the same overall rating of 46/100. Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Redmi Note 13 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Oppo Reno12 F 4G doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno12 F 4G
Redmi Note 13 4G
What makes Oppo Reno12 F 4G better?
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Lighter: 187g vs 188g
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 46/100)
- Better portability (70/100 vs 67/100)
What makes Redmi Note 13 4G better?
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (44/100 vs 40/100)
Comparison verdict
The Oppo Reno12 F 4G and the Redmi Note 13 4G received the same MobileRank rating — 46/100. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 34/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100. In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Oppo Reno12 F 4G are nearly equal (44/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno12 F 4G and the Redmi Note 13 4G are nearly equal (48/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 F 4G and the Redmi Note 13 4G are nearly equal (70/100 vs 67/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno12 F 4G | Redmi Note 13 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | |
| AnTuTu | 476175 | 476175 | |
| Geekbench Single | 466 | 466 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1396 | 1396 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2100 nits | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 163.1×75.8×7.7 mm | 162.3×75.6×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno12 F 4G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi Note 13 4G
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Oppo Reno12 F 4G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 13 4G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno12 F 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Note 13 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Oppo Reno12 F 4G and Redmi Note 13 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 34/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Oppo Reno12 F 4G are nearly equal (44/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno12 F 4G and the Redmi Note 13 4G are nearly equal (48/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 F 4G and the Redmi Note 13 4G are nearly equal (70/100 vs 67/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno12 F 4G or the Redmi Note 13 4G?
Both devices scored 46/100. They are identical on performance — 34/100 for both. The clearest difference is camera: better on the Redmi Note 13 4G (44/100 vs 40/100).
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno12 F 4G and the Redmi Note 13 4G?
The Oppo Reno12 F 4G has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Redmi Note 13 4G — 46/100.
Should you choose the Oppo Reno12 F 4G over the Redmi Note 13 4G?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is camera — better on the Redmi Note 13 4G (44/100 vs 40/100).