Oppo Reno12 F 4G vs Redmi Note 13 4G
The Oppo Reno12 F 4G (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, while the Redmi Note 13 4G (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685. Both devices score the same overall rating of 46/100. Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Redmi Note 13 4G is faster in AnTuTu (471,425 vs 467,392); the Redmi Note 13 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Oppo Reno12 F 4G doesn't.
Oppo Reno12 F 4G
Redmi Note 13 4G
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Lighter: 187g vs 188g
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 46/100)
- Better portability (70/100 vs 67/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 471425 vs 467392
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (34/100 vs 33/100)
- Better camera (44/100 vs 40/100)
The Oppo Reno12 F 4G and the Redmi Note 13 4G received the same MobileRank rating — 46/100. In the "performance" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Oppo Reno12 F 4G are nearly equal (34/100 vs 33/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100. In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Oppo Reno12 F 4G are nearly equal (44/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno12 F 4G and the Redmi Note 13 4G are nearly equal (48/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 F 4G and the Redmi Note 13 4G are nearly equal (70/100 vs 67/100).
| Specification | Oppo Reno12 F 4G | Redmi Note 13 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | |
| AnTuTu | 467392 | 471425 | |
| Geekbench Single | 466 | 466 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1396 | 1396 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2100 nits | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 163.1×75.8×7.7 mm | 162.3×75.6×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Oppo Reno12 F 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi Note 13 4G
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Oppo Reno12 F 4G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 13 4G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno12 F 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Note 13 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
We compared Oppo Reno12 F 4G and Redmi Note 13 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Note 13 4G leads Oppo Reno12 F 4G by 0.9% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Oppo Reno12 F 4G are nearly equal (34/100 vs 33/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Oppo Reno12 F 4G are nearly equal (44/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno12 F 4G and the Redmi Note 13 4G are nearly equal (48/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 F 4G and the Redmi Note 13 4G are nearly equal (70/100 vs 67/100).
Which is better: the Oppo Reno12 F 4G or the Redmi Note 13 4G?
Both devices scored 46/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Redmi Note 13 4G.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno12 F 4G and the Redmi Note 13 4G?
The Oppo Reno12 F 4G has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Redmi Note 13 4G — 46/100.
Should you choose the Oppo Reno12 F 4G over the Redmi Note 13 4G?
The Oppo Reno12 F 4G is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi Note 13 4G is a better fit for everyday use.