Redmi A7 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Redmi A7 (2026) runs on the Unisoc T7250, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $99 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 26/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 310,000); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi A7 doesn't; the Redmi A7 is noticeably lighter (193g vs 309g).
Redmi A7
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Lighter: 193g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $99 vs $2899
- Better design/ergonomics (58/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 310000
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 600
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 1800
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 42/100)
Comparing the Redmi A7 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 31 points higher (57/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 42/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi A7 leads (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Redmi A7 (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Redmi A7 (49/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi A7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (58/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi A7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (100/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Redmi A7 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T7250 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 310000 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 600 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1800 | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1640x720 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 171.8×79.8×8.3 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 193 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $99 | $2899 |
Redmi A7
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Redmi A7
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1640x720
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi A7
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Redmi A7 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Redmi A7 by 89.4% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2800. Redmi A7 is cheaper by $2800.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Redmi A7 (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Redmi A7 (49/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi A7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (58/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi A7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (100/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Redmi A7 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Redmi A7 by 31 points (57/100 vs 26/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi A7 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Redmi A7 has a MobileRank rating of 26/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi A7 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 0/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi A7 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Redmi A7 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Redmi A7 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.