Redmi A7 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

The Redmi A7 (2026) runs on the Unisoc T7250, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $99 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 66/100 vs 26/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi A7 has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,800,202 vs 310,000); the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi A7 doesn't; the Redmi A7 is noticeably lighter (193g vs 218g).

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi A7 by 40 points (66/100 vs 26/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi A7
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 0
Battery 42
Design 58
Value for money 100
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Performance 67
Display 100
Camera 81
Battery 45
Design 27
Value for money 20
What makes Redmi A7 better?
  • Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
  • Lighter: 193g vs 218g
  • Cheaper: $99 vs $1299

  • Better design/ergonomics (58/100 vs 27/100)
  • Better value for money (100/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 2800202 vs 310000
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 600
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 1800
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP

  • Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (81/100 vs 0/100)
  • Longer battery life (45/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi A7 vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 40 points higher (66/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi A7 leads (100/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi A7 (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi A7 (81/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Redmi A7 are nearly equal (45/100 vs 42/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi A7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (58/100 vs 27/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi A7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (100/100 vs 20/100).

Redmi A7: The Redmi A7 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi A7 Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Processor Unisoc T7250 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 310000 2800202
Geekbench Single 600 3100
Geekbench Multi 1800 9760
Display 6.9" IPS LCD 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1640x720 3120x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 15W 45W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 151
Main camera 13 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 12 MP
RAM 3GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 15 / One UI 7
Brightness (peak) 600 nits 2600 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 171.8×79.8×8.3 mm 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm
Weight 193 g 218 g
Price $99 $1299
Camera comparison
Redmi A7
  • Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
  • Front: 8MP
0
camera
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
81
camera
Display comparison
Redmi A7
  • 6.9" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1640x720
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Redmi A7
  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • No wireless charging
42
battery
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
45
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi A7 and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi A7 Unisoc T7250
26/100
310000 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
66/100 +88.9%
2800202 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads Redmi A7 by 88.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Redmi A7
$99
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
$1299

Price difference: $1200. Redmi A7 is cheaper by $1200.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi A7 (67/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi A7 (81/100 vs 0/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Redmi A7 are nearly equal (45/100 vs 42/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Redmi A7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (58/100 vs 27/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Redmi A7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (100/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi A7 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi A7 by 40 points (66/100 vs 26/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi A7 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Redmi A7 has a MobileRank rating of 26/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 66/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi A7 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 0/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi A7 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Redmi A7 over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Redmi A7 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.