Redmi Note 13R vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

The Redmi Note 13R (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 29/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5030); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Redmi Note 13R is noticeably lighter (205g vs 309g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13R by 28 points (57/100 vs 29/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 13R
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 24
Battery 41
Design 43
Value for money 55
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Performance 67
Display 100
Camera 49
Battery 52
Design 0
Value for money 0
What makes Redmi Note 13R better?
  • Lighter: 205g vs 309g

  • Better design/ergonomics (43/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
  • Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5030 mAh
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (49/100 vs 24/100)
  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 13R vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 28 points higher (57/100 vs 29/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 41/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 13R leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13R (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13R (49/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 41/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 13R significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 13R significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).

Redmi Note 13R: The Redmi Note 13R is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold: The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi Note 13R Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 2926532
Geekbench Single 3050
Geekbench Multi 9300
Display 6.8" IPS LCD 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1080x2460 2160x1584
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5030 mAh 5600 mAh
Charging 33W 45W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 8 MP 10 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB / 12GB 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 512GB
OS Android 14, HyperOS Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 550 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP53 IP48
Dimensions 168.6×76.3×8.2 mm 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm
Weight 205 g 309 g
Price $2899
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 13R
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
24
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
49
camera
Display comparison
Redmi Note 13R
  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2460
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2160x1584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 13R
  • 5030 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
41
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • 5600 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
52
battery
Benchmarks
Price and availability
Redmi Note 13R
Price unknown
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
$2899
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13R (67/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13R (49/100 vs 24/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 41/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 13R significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (43/100 vs 0/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 13R significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 13R or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13R by 28 points (57/100 vs 29/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13R and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Redmi Note 13R has a MobileRank rating of 29/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 13R or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 24/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 13R or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 13R over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Redmi Note 13R is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.