Poco M7 Plus 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

The Poco M7 Plus 5G (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $168 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 36/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Poco M7 Plus 5G has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 622,608); the Poco M7 Plus 5G is noticeably lighter (217g vs 309g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Poco M7 Plus 5G by 21 points (57/100 vs 36/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco M7 Plus 5G
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 37
Battery 53
Design 28
Value for money 98
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Performance 67
Display 100
Camera 49
Battery 52
Design 0
Value for money 0
What makes Poco M7 Plus 5G better?
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5600 mAh
  • Lighter: 217g vs 309g
  • Cheaper: $168 vs $2899

  • Longer battery life (53/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (28/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (98/100 vs 0/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 622608
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 938
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 2183
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP

  • Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (49/100 vs 37/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco M7 Plus 5G vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 21 points higher (57/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco M7 Plus 5G leads (98/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Poco M7 Plus 5G (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (49/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco M7 Plus 5G and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (53/100 vs 52/100). In the "design" category, the Poco M7 Plus 5G notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (28/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco M7 Plus 5G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (98/100 vs 0/100).

Poco M7 Plus 5G: The Poco M7 Plus 5G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold: The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Poco M7 Plus 5G Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 622608 2926532
Geekbench Single 938 3050
Geekbench Multi 2183 9300
Display 6.9" IPS LCD 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2460x1080 2160x1584
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 5600 mAh
Charging 33W 45W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
Main camera 108 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 13 MP 10 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP48
Dimensions 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm
Weight 217 g 309 g
Price $168 $2899
Camera comparison
Poco M7 Plus 5G
  • Main: 108MP f/1.75
  • Front: 13MP
37
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
49
camera
Display comparison
Poco M7 Plus 5G
  • 6.9" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 2460x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2160x1584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Poco M7 Plus 5G
  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • 5600 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
52
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Poco M7 Plus 5G and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco M7 Plus 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
36/100
622608 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
57/100 +78.7%
2926532 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Poco M7 Plus 5G by 78.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Poco M7 Plus 5G
$168
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
$2899

Price difference: $2731. Poco M7 Plus 5G is cheaper by $2731.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Poco M7 Plus 5G (67/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (49/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco M7 Plus 5G and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (53/100 vs 52/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Poco M7 Plus 5G notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (28/100 vs 0/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Poco M7 Plus 5G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (98/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco M7 Plus 5G or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Poco M7 Plus 5G by 21 points (57/100 vs 36/100).

What is the rating of the Poco M7 Plus 5G and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Poco M7 Plus 5G has a MobileRank rating of 36/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco M7 Plus 5G or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco M7 Plus 5G or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Poco M7 Plus 5G over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Poco M7 Plus 5G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.