Poco M7 Plus 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

The Poco M7 Plus 5G (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $168 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 51/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Poco M7 Plus 5G has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,463,142 vs 617,626).

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M7 Plus 5G by 33 points (84/100 vs 51/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Poco M7 Plus 5G

Performance 48
Display 65
Camera 40
Battery 68
Portability 42
Value for money 72

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Performance 96
Display 88
Camera 86
Battery 61
Portability 51
Value for money 78

What makes Poco M7 Plus 5G better?

  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Cheaper at launch: $168 vs $1299

  • Longer battery life (68/100 vs 61/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3463142 vs 617626
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 938
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 2183
  • Faster charging: 60W vs 33W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
  • Lighter: 214g vs 217g

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 48/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 40/100)
  • Better display (88/100 vs 65/100)
  • Better portability (51/100 vs 42/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco M7 Plus 5G vs the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 33 points higher (84/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 48/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 40/100). Value score: Poco M7 Plus 5G — 72/100, Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 78/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M7 Plus 5G (96/100 vs 48/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco M7 Plus 5G (88/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M7 Plus 5G (86/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco M7 Plus 5G is a bit better (68/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 42/100).

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Poco M7 Plus 5G Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 617626 3463142
Geekbench Single 938 3601
Geekbench Multi 2183 10686
Display 6.9" IPS LCD 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2460x1080 3120x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 33W 60W
Wireless charging — 25W
DXOMark (camera) — 157
Main camera 108 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 12 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) — 2600 nits
NFC — yes
Protection — IP68
Dimensions — 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm
Weight 217 g 214 g
Launch price $168 $1299

Camera comparison

Poco M7 Plus 5G

  • Main: 108MP f/1.75
  • Front: 13MP
40
camera

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
86
camera

Display comparison

Poco M7 Plus 5G

  • 6.9" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 2460x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
65
display

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Battery and charging

Poco M7 Plus 5G

  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • Wireless charging: no data
68
battery

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Poco M7 Plus 5G and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco M7 Plus 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
51/100
617626 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100 +82.2%
3463142 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Poco M7 Plus 5G by 82.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Poco M7 Plus 5G

$168

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

$1299

Launch price difference: $1131. Poco M7 Plus 5G was $1131 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M7 Plus 5G (96/100 vs 48/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco M7 Plus 5G (88/100 vs 65/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M7 Plus 5G (86/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco M7 Plus 5G is a bit better (68/100 vs 61/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Poco M7 Plus 5G or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M7 Plus 5G by 33 points (84/100 vs 51/100).

What is the rating of the Poco M7 Plus 5G and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Poco M7 Plus 5G has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco M7 Plus 5G or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 40/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco M7 Plus 5G or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 48/100).

Should you choose the Poco M7 Plus 5G over the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.