Poco C65 vs Vivo Y28 4G
The Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Vivo Y28 4G (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y28 4G leads — 37/100 vs 33/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y28 4G has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Poco C65 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y28 4G doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C65
Vivo Y28 4G
What makes Poco C65 better?
- Lighter: 192g vs 199g
- Better portability (63/100 vs 60/100)
What makes Vivo Y28 4G better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 419 vs 375
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1461 vs 1031
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 44W vs 18W
- Higher performance (29/100 vs 25/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco C65 vs the Vivo Y28 4G, the Vivo Y28 4G scores 4 points higher (37/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y28 4G leads (56/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y28 4G and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (29/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y28 4G is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 and the Vivo Y28 4G are nearly equal (63/100 vs 60/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco C65 | Vivo Y28 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Helio G85 | |
| AnTuTu | 348562 | 348562 | |
| Geekbench Single | 375 | 419 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1031 | 1461 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 720x1608 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13 / HyperOS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | 165.7×76.0×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $99 | — |
Camera comparison
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y28 4G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y28 4G
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1608
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y28 4G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Poco C65 and Vivo Y28 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y28 4G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y28 4G and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (29/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y28 4G is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 and the Vivo Y28 4G are nearly equal (63/100 vs 60/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C65 or the Vivo Y28 4G?
The Vivo Y28 4G edges out the Poco C65 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco C65 and the Vivo Y28 4G?
The Poco C65 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Vivo Y28 4G — 37/100.
Should you choose the Poco C65 over the Vivo Y28 4G?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Vivo Y28 4G (56/100 vs 43/100).