Nothing Phone (3) vs Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo

The Nothing Phone (3) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, while the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $799 and $460. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo leads — 78/100 vs 76/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo has the bigger battery (7600 mAh vs 5150); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo is faster in AnTuTu (2,955,676 vs 2,306,162); the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo is thinner (7.9mm vs 9.0mm).

The Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo edges out the Nothing Phone (3) by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nothing Phone (3)
Performance 81
Display 85
Camera 81
Battery 63
Portability 49
Value for money 64
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
Performance 94
Display 94
Camera 53
Battery 74
Portability 59
Value for money 86
What makes Nothing Phone (3) better?
  • Lighter: 198g vs 202g

  • Better camera (81/100 vs 53/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 2955676 vs 2306162
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2162
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 6847
  • Bigger battery: 7600 vs 5150 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 65W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $460 vs $799

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 81/100)
  • Longer battery life (74/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 85/100)
  • Better portability (59/100 vs 49/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nothing Phone (3) vs the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo scores 2 points higher (78/100 vs 76/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo leads (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3) leads (81/100 vs 53/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo leads (74/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Nothing Phone (3) — 64/100, Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo (81/100 vs 53/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo is a bit better (74/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo is a bit better (59/100 vs 49/100).

Nothing Phone (3): The Nothing Phone (3) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo: The Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nothing Phone (3) Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2306162 2955676
Geekbench Single 2162 3640
Geekbench Multi 6847 11033
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 2800x1260 1260x2750
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5150 mAh 7600 mAh
Charging 65W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.0 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 5500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 160.6×75.6×9.0 mm 157.6×74.4×7.9 mm
Weight 198 g 202 g
Launch price $799 $460
Camera comparison
Nothing Phone (3)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
81
camera
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 32MP
53
camera
Display comparison
Nothing Phone (3)
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2750
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display
Battery and charging
Nothing Phone (3)
  • 5150 mAh
  • Wired: 65W
  • Wireless: 15W
63
battery
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
  • 7600 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
74
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nothing Phone (3) and Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
76/100
2306162 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
78/100 +22.0%
2955676 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo leads Nothing Phone (3) by 22.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nothing Phone (3)
$799
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
$460

Launch price difference: $339. Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo was $339 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo (81/100 vs 53/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo is a bit better (74/100 vs 63/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo is a bit better (59/100 vs 49/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nothing Phone (3) or the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo?

The Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo edges out the Nothing Phone (3) by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (3) and the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo?

The Nothing Phone (3) has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo — 78/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (3) or the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo?

The Nothing Phone (3) leads on camera score (81/100 vs 53/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (3) or the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo?

The Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo leads on performance (94/100 vs 81/100).

Should you choose the Nothing Phone (3) over the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo?

The Nothing Phone (3) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.