Nothing Phone (3) vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Nothing Phone (3) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $799 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 76/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5150); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,306,162); the Nothing Phone (3) is noticeably lighter (198g vs 230g).
Nothing Phone (3)
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 198g vs 230g
- Cheaper: $799 vs $950
- Better portability (49/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2306162
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2162
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 6847
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5150 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 65W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 81/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 81/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
- Better value for money (94/100 vs 64/100)
Comparing the Nothing Phone (3) vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 15 points higher (91/100 vs 76/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (94/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3) are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (96/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (3) is a bit better (49/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (94/100 vs 64/100).
| Specification | Nothing Phone (3) | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2306162 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2162 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6847 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1260 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5150 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 65W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.0 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 160.6×75.6×9.0 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 230 g | |
| Price | $799 | $950 |
Nothing Phone (3)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Nothing Phone (3)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nothing Phone (3)
- 5150 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Nothing Phone (3) and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (3) by 45.7% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $151. Nothing Phone (3) is cheaper by $151.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (99/100 vs 81/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3) are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (96/100 vs 81/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (85/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (3) is a bit better (49/100 vs 39/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (94/100 vs 64/100).
Which is better: the Nothing Phone (3) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Nothing Phone (3) — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (3) and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Nothing Phone (3) has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (3) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 81/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (3) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 81/100).
Should you choose the Nothing Phone (3) over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Nothing Phone (3) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.