Nothing Phone (2a) Plus vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 59/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,037,391); the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus is noticeably lighter (190g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Nothing Phone (2a) Plus better?
- Lighter: 190g vs 230g
- Better portability (59/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1037391
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1111
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2560
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 50W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 57/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 49/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 32 points higher (91/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (99/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (96/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (59/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nothing Phone (2a) Plus | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1037391 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1111 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2560 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 50W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 2.6 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.7×76.3×8.5 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 50W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Nothing Phone (2a) Plus and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (2a) Plus by 75.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (99/100 vs 57/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (96/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (85/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (59/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus by 32 points (91/100 vs 59/100).
What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 60/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.