Nothing Phone (2a) Plus vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 59/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,037,391); the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus is noticeably lighter (190g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus by 32 points (91/100 vs 59/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Performance 57
Display 80
Camera 60
Battery 49
Portability 59
Value for money
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Nothing Phone (2a) Plus better?
  • Lighter: 190g vs 230g

  • Better portability (59/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1037391
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1111
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2560
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 50W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 60/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 49/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 32 points higher (91/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (99/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (96/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (59/100 vs 39/100).

Nothing Phone (2a) Plus: The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1037391 4247433
Geekbench Single 1111 3640
Geekbench Multi 2560 11033
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1080x2412 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 50W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 2.6 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1300 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP54 IP69
Dimensions 161.7×76.3×8.5 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 190 g 230 g
Price $950
Camera comparison
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2412
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 50W
  • No wireless charging
49
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nothing Phone (2a) Plus and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nothing Phone (2a) Plus MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro
59/100
1037391 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +75.6%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (2a) Plus by 75.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (99/100 vs 57/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (96/100 vs 60/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (85/100 vs 49/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (59/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus by 32 points (91/100 vs 59/100).

What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 60/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 57/100).

Should you choose the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.