Nothing Phone (2) vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Nothing Phone (2) (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $599 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 63/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,436,722); the Nothing Phone (2) is noticeably lighter (201g vs 230g).
Nothing Phone (2)
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 201g vs 230g
- Cheaper: $599 vs $950
- Better portability (52/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1436722
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1500
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4200
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 68/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 50/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
- Better value for money (94/100 vs 38/100)
Comparing the Nothing Phone (2) vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 28 points higher (91/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (94/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) (99/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) (85/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (2) is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) (94/100 vs 38/100).
| Specification | Nothing Phone (2) | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1436722 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1500 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4200 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2412x1080 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 / Nothing OS 2.0 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×76.4×8.6 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 230 g | |
| Price | $599 | $950 |
Nothing Phone (2)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Nothing Phone (2)
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2412x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nothing Phone (2)
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Nothing Phone (2) and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (2) by 66.2% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $351. Nothing Phone (2) is cheaper by $351.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) (99/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) (96/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) (85/100 vs 50/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (2) is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) (94/100 vs 38/100).
Which is better: the Nothing Phone (2) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) by 28 points (91/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (2) and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Nothing Phone (2) has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (2) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (2) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Nothing Phone (2) over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Nothing Phone (2) is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.