OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $600 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 69/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 5600); the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 2,926,532); the OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably lighter (188g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 2926532
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $2899
- Better camera (94/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 6405
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 14 points higher (83/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 52/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (95/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (66/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (64/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 5.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2299. OPPO Reno16 Pro was $2299 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (95/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (66/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (64/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.