OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $600 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 83/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 6510); the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 3,079,298); the OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably lighter (188g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 6510 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $899
- Better display (95/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 3079298
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 6405
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 94/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 5 points higher (88/100 vs 83/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 66/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the OPPO Reno16 Pro are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (64/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | $899 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads OPPO Reno16 Pro by 7.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $299. OPPO Reno16 Pro was $299 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the OPPO Reno16 Pro are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (81/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (64/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the OPPO Reno16 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.