OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 74/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 3,079,298); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.5mm vs 8.2mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 201g
- Better camera (94/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 80/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 3079298
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6405
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 82/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 9 points higher (83/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (98/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (98/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (95/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (94/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (74/100 vs 64/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 1828x2448 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 / One UI 9 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | — |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1828x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads OPPO Reno16 Pro by 22.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (98/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (95/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (94/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (74/100 vs 64/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 50/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (98/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.