OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888; launch prices were $661 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 48/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 200 MP vs 12 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 1,119,714).
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 1119714
- Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 1488
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 3373
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 10W
- Cheaper at launch: $661 vs $1799
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 63/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 20/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 38/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 20/100)
- Overall rating 48/100
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 38 points higher (86/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 38/100). Value score: OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 84/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 — 0/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (89/100 vs 63/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (94/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (83/100 vs 38/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (54/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 1119714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 1488 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 3373 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 2208x1768 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 4400 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 10W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 12 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 11 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | — | 271 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | $1799 |
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
- Main: 12MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
- 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2208x1768
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 10W
We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 by 175.0% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1138. OPPO Reno 16 Pro was $1138 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (89/100 vs 63/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (94/100 vs 20/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (83/100 vs 38/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (54/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 by 38 points (86/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 — 48/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 20/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 63/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 is a better fit for active users.