OPPO Find X9 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3

The OPPO Find X9 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888; launch prices were $999 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Find X9 leads — 83/100 vs 48/100 (a 35-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Find X9 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 50 MP vs 12 MP; the OPPO Find X9 is faster in AnTuTu (3,400,423 vs 1,119,714); the OPPO Find X9 is noticeably lighter (207g vs 271g).

The OPPO Find X9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 by 35 points (83/100 vs 48/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Find X9
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 78
Battery 78
Portability 55
Value for money 78
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
Performance 63
Display 78
Camera 20
Battery 38
Portability 20
Value for money 0
What makes OPPO Find X9 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3400423 vs 1119714
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1488
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 3373
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 10W
  • Lighter: 207g vs 271g
  • Cheaper at launch: $999 vs $1799

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 20/100)
  • Longer battery life (78/100 vs 38/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better portability (55/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 better?

  • Overall rating 48/100
Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Find X9 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3, the OPPO Find X9 scores 35 points higher (83/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 leads (93/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 leads (78/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 leads (78/100 vs 38/100). Value score: OPPO Find X9 — 78/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 — 0/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (93/100 vs 63/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Find X9 is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (78/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (78/100 vs 38/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Find X9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (55/100 vs 20/100).

OPPO Find X9: The OPPO Find X9 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification OPPO Find X9 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
AnTuTu 3400423 1119714
Geekbench Single 3228 1488
Geekbench Multi 9553 3373
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2780x1264 2208x1768
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 4400 mAh
Charging 80W 25W
Wireless charging 50W 10W
Main camera 50 MP 12 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 12 MP
Front camera 32 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 11
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 157.0×73.9×8.0 mm
Weight 207 g 271 g
Launch price $999 $1799
Camera comparison
OPPO Find X9
  • Main: 50MP f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
  • Main: 12MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
20
camera
Display comparison
OPPO Find X9
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2780x1264
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
  • 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2208x1768
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display
Battery and charging
OPPO Find X9
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
78
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 10W
38
battery
Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Find X9 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
83/100
3400423 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
48/100 -203.7%
1119714 AnTuTu

OPPO Find X9 leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 by 203.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
OPPO Find X9
$999
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
$1799

Launch price difference: $800. OPPO Find X9 was $800 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (93/100 vs 63/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO Find X9 is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (78/100 vs 20/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (78/100 vs 38/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OPPO Find X9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (55/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Find X9 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?

The OPPO Find X9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 by 35 points (83/100 vs 48/100).

What is the rating of the OPPO Find X9 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?

The OPPO Find X9 has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 — 48/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Find X9 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?

The OPPO Find X9 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 20/100).

Which is more powerful: the OPPO Find X9 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?

The OPPO Find X9 leads on performance (93/100 vs 63/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Find X9 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?

The OPPO Find X9 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 is a better fit for active users.