OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate; launch prices were $661 and $249. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 63/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 1,030,590).
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 1030590
- Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 3185
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 61/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 82/100)
- Cheaper at launch: $249 vs $661
- Better portability (74/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 23 points higher (86/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 58/100). Value score: OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 84/100, Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 80/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (89/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (94/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (83/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (74/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 1030590 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 3185 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 1208x2644 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | — | 178 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | $249 |
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 198.8% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $412. Tecno Camon 50 Ultra was $412 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (89/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (94/100 vs 61/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (83/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (74/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 23 points (86/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 63/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 61/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.