Nubia Focus vs ZTE Axon 40 pro
The Nubia Focus (2024) runs on the Unisoc T760, while the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads — 58/100 vs 45/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 628,581).
Nubia Focus
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Overall rating 45/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 628581
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 746
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 2186
- Faster charging: 65W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 205g
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (44/100 vs 39/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 56/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Nubia Focus vs the ZTE Axon 40 pro, the ZTE Axon 40 pro scores 13 points higher (58/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (61/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the Nubia Focus (61/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Nubia Focus (89/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Nubia Focus are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).
| Specification | Nubia Focus | ZTE Axon 40 pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T760 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 628581 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2186 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×74.9×8.6 mm | 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Nubia Focus
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Nubia Focus
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Nubia Focus
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nubia Focus and ZTE Axon 40 pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 pro leads Nubia Focus by 37.8% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the Nubia Focus (61/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Nubia Focus (89/100 vs 56/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Nubia Focus are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).
Which is better: the Nubia Focus or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro is noticeably better than the Nubia Focus — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Nubia Focus and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Nubia Focus has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nubia Focus or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on camera score (44/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nubia Focus or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on performance (61/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Focus over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Nubia Focus is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for active users.