OPPO K15 Pro+ vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3

The OPPO K15 Pro+ (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888; launch prices were $509 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO K15 Pro+ leads — 71/100 vs 48/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO K15 Pro+ has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 50 MP vs 12 MP; the OPPO K15 Pro+ is faster in AnTuTu (3,121,723 vs 1,119,714); the OPPO K15 Pro+ is noticeably lighter (219g vs 271g).

The OPPO K15 Pro+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 by 23 points (71/100 vs 48/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO K15 Pro+
Performance 89
Display 94
Camera 35
Battery 75
Portability 44
Value for money 66
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
Performance 63
Display 78
Camera 20
Battery 38
Portability 20
Value for money 0
What makes OPPO K15 Pro+ better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3121723 vs 1119714
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 1488
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 3373
  • Bigger battery: 8000 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 219g vs 271g
  • Cheaper at launch: $509 vs $1799

  • Higher performance (89/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better camera (35/100 vs 20/100)
  • Longer battery life (75/100 vs 38/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better portability (44/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 better?

  • Overall rating 48/100
Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO K15 Pro+ vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3, the OPPO K15 Pro+ scores 23 points higher (71/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO K15 Pro+ leads (89/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO K15 Pro+ leads (35/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO K15 Pro+ leads (75/100 vs 38/100). Value score: OPPO K15 Pro+ — 66/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 — 0/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the OPPO K15 Pro+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (89/100 vs 63/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO K15 Pro+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO K15 Pro+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (35/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO K15 Pro+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (75/100 vs 38/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO K15 Pro+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (44/100 vs 20/100).

OPPO K15 Pro+: The OPPO K15 Pro+ is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification OPPO K15 Pro+ Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500s Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
AnTuTu 3121723 1119714
Geekbench Single 2680 1488
Geekbench Multi 8358 3373
Display 6.8" AMOLED 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2772x1272 2208x1768
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 8000 mAh 4400 mAh
Charging 100W 25W
Wireless charging 0W 10W
Main camera 50 MP 12 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 12 MP
Front camera 16 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 11
Brightness (peak) 1800 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 162.4×77.5×8.3 mm
Weight 219 g 271 g
Launch price $509 $1799
Camera comparison
OPPO K15 Pro+
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
  • Main: 12MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
20
camera
Display comparison
OPPO K15 Pro+
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1272
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
  • 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2208x1768
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display
Battery and charging
OPPO K15 Pro+
  • 8000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
75
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 10W
38
battery
Overall performance score

We compared OPPO K15 Pro+ and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO K15 Pro+ MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
71/100
3121723 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
48/100 -178.8%
1119714 AnTuTu

OPPO K15 Pro+ leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 by 178.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
OPPO K15 Pro+
$509
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
$1799

Launch price difference: $1290. OPPO K15 Pro+ was $1290 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO K15 Pro+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (89/100 vs 63/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO K15 Pro+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (94/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO K15 Pro+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (35/100 vs 20/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO K15 Pro+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (75/100 vs 38/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OPPO K15 Pro+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (44/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO K15 Pro+ or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?

The OPPO K15 Pro+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 by 23 points (71/100 vs 48/100).

What is the rating of the OPPO K15 Pro+ and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?

The OPPO K15 Pro+ has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 — 48/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO K15 Pro+ or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?

The OPPO K15 Pro+ leads on camera score (35/100 vs 20/100).

Which is more powerful: the OPPO K15 Pro+ or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?

The OPPO K15 Pro+ leads on performance (89/100 vs 63/100).

Should you choose the OPPO K15 Pro+ over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?

The OPPO K15 Pro+ is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 is a better fit for active users.