Nokia X30 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Nokia X30 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 23/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 592,015); the Nokia X30 is noticeably lighter (185g vs 309g).
Nokia X30
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Lighter: 185g vs 309g
- Better design/ergonomics (68/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 592015
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 905
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 2003
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 20/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Nokia X30 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 34 points higher (57/100 vs 23/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 20/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia X30 leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nokia X30 (49/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 (52/100 vs 20/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia X30 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (68/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia X30 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Nokia X30 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.4" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 700 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP67 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 158.9×73.9×8.0 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 185 g | 309 g | |
| Price | — | $2899 |
Nokia X30
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Nokia X30
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia X30
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Nokia X30 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Nokia X30 by 79.8% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia X30
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nokia X30 (49/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 (52/100 vs 20/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia X30 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (68/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Nokia X30 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Nokia X30 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 by 34 points (57/100 vs 23/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia X30 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Nokia X30 has a MobileRank rating of 23/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia X30 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia X30 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia X30 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Nokia X30 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.