Nokia G60 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Nokia G60 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $329 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 29/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 592,015); the Nokia G60 is noticeably lighter (190g vs 309g).
Nokia G60
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Lighter: 190g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $329 vs $2899
- Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (87/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 592015
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 905
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 2003
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 20W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 26/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 24/100)
Comparing the Nokia G60 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 28 points higher (57/100 vs 29/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia G60 leads (87/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia G60 (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nokia G60 (49/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nokia G60 (52/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia G60 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (62/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia G60 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (87/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Nokia G60 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 166.0×75.9×8.6 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $329 | $2899 |
Nokia G60
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Nokia G60
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2408x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia G60
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Nokia G60 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Nokia G60 by 79.8% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2570. Nokia G60 is cheaper by $2570.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia G60 (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nokia G60 (49/100 vs 26/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nokia G60 (52/100 vs 24/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia G60 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (62/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Nokia G60 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (87/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Nokia G60 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia G60 by 28 points (57/100 vs 29/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia G60 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Nokia G60 has a MobileRank rating of 29/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia G60 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 26/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia G60 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia G60 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Nokia G60 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.