Nokia XR21 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

The Nokia XR21 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 46/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 592,015); the Nokia XR21 is noticeably lighter (231g vs 309g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia XR21 by 23 points (69/100 vs 46/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia XR21
Performance 46
Display 67
Camera 43
Battery 42
Portability 24
Value for money
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Performance 91
Display 70
Camera 52
Battery 63
Portability 20
Value for money 42
What makes Nokia XR21 better?
  • Lighter: 231g vs 309g

  • Better portability (24/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 592015
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 905
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2003
  • Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4800 mAh
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better camera (52/100 vs 43/100)
  • Longer battery life (63/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better display (70/100 vs 67/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia XR21 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 23 points higher (69/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (91/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia XR21 (91/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Nokia XR21 are nearly equal (70/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nokia XR21 (63/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia XR21 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (24/100 vs 20/100).

Nokia XR21: The Nokia XR21 is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold: The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia XR21 Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 592015 2926532
Geekbench Single 905 3041
Geekbench Multi 2003 9494
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1080x2400 2160x1584
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4800 mAh 5600 mAh
Charging 33W 45W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
Main camera 64 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 16 MP 10 MP
RAM 6GB 16GB
Storage 128GB 512GB
OS Android 12 Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 550 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP48
Dimensions 168.0×78.6×10.5 mm 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm
Weight 231 g 309 g
Price $2899
Camera comparison
Nokia XR21
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
43
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
52
camera
Display comparison
Nokia XR21
  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
67
display
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2160x1584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
70
display
Battery and charging
Nokia XR21
  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
42
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • 5600 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
63
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia XR21 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia XR21 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
46/100
592015 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
69/100 +79.8%
2926532 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Nokia XR21 by 79.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Nokia XR21
Price unknown
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
$2899
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia XR21 (91/100 vs 46/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Nokia XR21 are nearly equal (70/100 vs 67/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nokia XR21 (63/100 vs 42/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nokia XR21 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (24/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia XR21 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia XR21 by 23 points (69/100 vs 46/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia XR21 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Nokia XR21 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia XR21 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 43/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia XR21 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 46/100).

Should you choose the Nokia XR21 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Nokia XR21 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.