Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 18/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 597,974); the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is noticeably lighter (230g vs 309g).
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Lighter: 230g vs 309g
- Better design/ergonomics (12/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 597974
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 799
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 1836
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 45/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 39 points higher (57/100 vs 18/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Nokia 8 V 5G UW are nearly equal (49/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (52/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a bit better (12/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Nokia 8 V 5G UW | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 597974 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 799 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1836 | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.0" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 24 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 171.9×78.6×9.0 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 309 g | |
| Price | — | $2899 |
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 24MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
- 6.0" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Nokia 8 V 5G UW and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Nokia 8 V 5G UW by 79.6% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Nokia 8 V 5G UW are nearly equal (49/100 vs 45/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (52/100 vs 24/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a bit better (12/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW by 39 points (57/100 vs 18/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia 8 V 5G UW and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a MobileRank rating of 18/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia 8 V 5G UW over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.