Motorola Razr Fold vs Vivo Y300 (China)
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Vivo Y300 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 48/100 (a 35-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y300 (China) has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 528,398); the Motorola Razr Fold has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 (China) doesn't; the Vivo Y300 (China) is noticeably lighter (200g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Vivo Y300 (China)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 528398
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 1980
- Faster charging: 68W vs 44W
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 79/100)
What makes Vivo Y300 (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 200g vs 285g
- Better portability (61/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Vivo Y300 (China), the Motorola Razr Fold scores 35 points higher (83/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (90/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo Y300 (China) are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (91/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) is a bit better (61/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Vivo Y300 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 528398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 1980 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 44W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 163.6×76.2×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 200 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Vivo Y300 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Vivo Y300 (China) by 478.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y300 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (90/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo Y300 (China) are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (91/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) is a bit better (61/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) by 35 points (83/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo Y300 (China) — 48/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.