Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Vivo Y300 (China)
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo Y300 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 31/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y300 (China) has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 524,785); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 (China) doesn't.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 524785
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1980
- Faster charging: 68W vs 44W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 200g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (58/100 vs 24/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 51/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 34/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Vivo Y300 (China), the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 42 points higher (73/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) leads (55/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (58/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra are nearly equal (54/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Vivo Y300 (China) are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (55/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | Vivo Y300 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 1980 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 44W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 163.6×76.2×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 200 g | |
| Price | $1099 | — |
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Vivo Y300 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Vivo Y300 (China) by 651.3% in our overall performance rating.
Vivo Y300 (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (92/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (58/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra are nearly equal (54/100 vs 51/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Vivo Y300 (China) are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (55/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) by 42 points (73/100 vs 31/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Vivo Y300 (China) — 31/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on camera score (58/100 vs 24/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo Y300 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.