Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Vivo Y300 (China)
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo Y300 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 77/100 vs 48/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y300 (China) has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,126,402 vs 528,398); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 (China) doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Vivo Y300 (China)
What makes Motorola Razr 70 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3126402 vs 528398
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1980
- Faster charging: 68W vs 44W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 200g
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (61/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 61/100)
What makes Vivo Y300 (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Overall rating 48/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Vivo Y300 (China), the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 29 points higher (77/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (60/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (91/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (95/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (60/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Vivo Y300 (China) are nearly equal (61/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 61/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | Vivo Y300 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 3126402 | 528398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 1980 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 44W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 163.6×76.2×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 200 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Vivo Y300 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Vivo Y300 (China) by 491.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y300 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (91/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (95/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (60/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Vivo Y300 (China) are nearly equal (61/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 61/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) by 29 points (77/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo Y300 (China) — 48/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on camera score (60/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.