Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo Y300 (China)

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo Y300 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 48/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y300 (China) has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 524,785); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 (China) doesn't.

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) by 28 points (76/100 vs 48/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 94
Camera 57
Battery 58
Portability 68
Value for money 64
Vivo Y300 (China)
Performance 43
Display 79
Camera 30
Battery 58
Portability 61
Value for money
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 524785
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 771
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 1980
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 44W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 200g

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better camera (57/100 vs 30/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 61/100)
What makes Vivo Y300 (China) better?
  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 4700 mAh

  • Overall rating 48/100
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Vivo Y300 (China), the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 28 points higher (76/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (92/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (57/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 58/100. In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 61/100).

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo Y300 (China): The Vivo Y300 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Vivo Y300 (China)
Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 6300
AnTuTu 3113462 524785
Geekbench Single 3041 771
Geekbench Multi 9494 1980
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2912 1080x2392
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 6500 mAh
Charging 68W 44W
Wireless charging 30W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 8 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 15, OriginOS 5
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 1800 nits
NFC yes no
Protection IP48 IP64
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 163.6×76.2×7.8 mm
Weight 199 g 200 g
Launch price $1099
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera
Vivo Y300 (China)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2912
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display
Vivo Y300 (China)
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2392
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
58
battery
Vivo Y300 (China)
  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 44W
  • No wireless charging
58
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Vivo Y300 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite
76/100
3113462 AnTuTu
Vivo Y300 (China) MediaTek Dimensity 6300
48/100 -493.3%
524785 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Vivo Y300 (China) by 493.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
$1099
Vivo Y300 (China)
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (92/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (94/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (57/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 58/100.

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 61/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo Y300 (China)?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) by 28 points (76/100 vs 48/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo Y300 (China)?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo Y300 (China) — 48/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo Y300 (China)?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo Y300 (China)?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Vivo Y300 (China)?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo Y300 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.