Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy A26
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy A26 (2025) runs on the Exynos 1380; launch prices were $1799 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 50/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 754,064); the Samsung Galaxy A26 is noticeably lighter (200g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Samsung Galaxy A26
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 754064
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1008
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 2710
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 79/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A26 better?
- Lighter: 200g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $1799
- Better portability (63/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy A26, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 33 points higher (83/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Samsung Galaxy A26 — 50/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (90/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy A26 are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (91/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (68/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 is a bit better (63/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy A26 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Exynos 1380 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 754064 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 1008 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 2710 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP67 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 164.0×77.5×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 200 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $250 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A26
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A26
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy A26
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy A26, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Samsung Galaxy A26 by 305.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1549. Samsung Galaxy A26 was $1549 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (90/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy A26 are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (91/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (68/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 is a bit better (63/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 by 33 points (83/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy A26 — 50/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.