Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A26
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy A26 (2025) runs on the Exynos 1380; launch prices were $1099 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 51/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A26 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 749,719).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy A26
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 749719
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1008
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2758
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 200g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 53/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 63/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $1099
- Overall rating 51/100
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy A26, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 25 points higher (76/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 64/100, Samsung Galaxy A26 — 54/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (92/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (57/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A26 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Exynos 1380 | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 749719 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1008 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 2758 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP67 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.0×77.5×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 200 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $250 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A26
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A26
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy A26
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A26, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A26 by 315.3% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $849. Samsung Galaxy A26 was $849 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (92/100 vs 53/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (94/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (57/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 by 25 points (76/100 vs 51/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy A26 — 51/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy A26 is a better fit for everyday use.