Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A26
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy A26 (2025) runs on the Exynos 1380; estimated prices are $1099 and $182. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 32/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 749,719).
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy A26
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 749719
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1008
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2758
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 200g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (58/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 37/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 50/100)
- Cheaper: $182 vs $1099
- Better value for money (97/100 vs 34/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy A26, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 41 points higher (73/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 leads (97/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (58/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy A26 are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (97/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A26 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Exynos 1380 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 749719 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 1008 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 2758 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP67 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.0×77.5×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 200 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $182 |
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy A26
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A26
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy A26
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A26, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A26 by 425.9% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $917. Samsung Galaxy A26 is cheaper by $917.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (92/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (58/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy A26 are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (97/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 by 41 points (73/100 vs 32/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Samsung Galaxy A26 — 32/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on camera score (58/100 vs 29/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy A26 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.