Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A26
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy A26 (2025) runs on the Exynos 1380; launch prices were $1099 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 77/100 vs 50/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,126,402 vs 754,064).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy A26
What makes Motorola Razr 70 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3126402 vs 754064
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1008
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2710
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 200g
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (61/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 63/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A26 better?
- Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $1099
- Overall rating 50/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy A26, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 27 points higher (77/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (60/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 70 Ultra — 64/100, Samsung Galaxy A26 — 50/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (91/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (95/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (60/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (61/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A26 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Exynos 1380 | |
| AnTuTu | 3126402 | 754064 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1008 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 2710 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP67 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.0×77.5×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 200 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $250 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy A26
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A26
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy A26
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A26, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A26 by 314.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $849. Samsung Galaxy A26 was $849 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (91/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (95/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (60/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (61/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 by 27 points (77/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Samsung Galaxy A26 — 50/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on camera score (60/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.