Motorola Razr 40 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 40 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 56/100 (a 35-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 840,330); the Motorola Razr 40 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 230g).
Motorola Razr 40
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 230g
- Better display (91/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (73/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 840330
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1039
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2885
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 5W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 34/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 35 points higher (91/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (96/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (85/100 vs 34/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (73/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 840330 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1039 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2885 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.4 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Motorola Razr 40
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr 40
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 40
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Motorola Razr 40 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Razr 40 by 80.2% in our overall performance rating.
Motorola Razr 40
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (99/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (96/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (85/100 vs 34/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (73/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 by 35 points (91/100 vs 56/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 40 has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 50/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 40 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.