Motorola Razr 40 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 40 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 56/100 (a 35-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 859,516); the Motorola Razr 40 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 40
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Motorola Razr 40 better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 230g
- Better display (91/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (73/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 859516
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1044
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2785
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 5W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 35 points higher (91/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (96/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (85/100 vs 34/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (73/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 859516 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1044 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2785 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.4 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 40
- Main: 64MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 40
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 40
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 40 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Razr 40 by 79.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 40
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (99/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (96/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (85/100 vs 34/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (73/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 by 35 points (91/100 vs 56/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 40 has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 50/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.