Motorola Razr 40 vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 40 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 56/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 859,516); the Motorola Razr 40 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 227g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 40
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
What makes Motorola Razr 40 better?
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 188g vs 227g
- Better portability (73/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 859516
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1044
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2785
- Bigger battery: 7400 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 30W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 5W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 34/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 91/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 33 points higher (89/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (78/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (92/100 vs 34/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (73/100 vs 35/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 | Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 859516 | 4602290 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1044 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2785 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 7400 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB / 24GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 8000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.4 mm | 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | — | $799 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 40
- Main: 64MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 40
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 40
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 7400 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 40 and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Motorola Razr 40 by 81.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 40
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (99/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (78/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (92/100 vs 34/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (73/100 vs 35/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 by 33 points (89/100 vs 56/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 40 has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 50/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.