Motorola Razr 40 vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 40 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 56/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 840,330); the Motorola Razr 40 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 227g).
Motorola Razr 40
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 188g vs 227g
- Better portability (73/100 vs 35/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 840330
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1039
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2885
- Bigger battery: 7400 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 30W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 5W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 34/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 91/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 33 points higher (89/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (78/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (92/100 vs 34/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (73/100 vs 35/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 | Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 840330 | 4602290 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1039 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2885 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 7400 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB / 24GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 8000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.4 mm | 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | — | $799 |
Motorola Razr 40
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr 40
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Motorola Razr 40
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 7400 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Motorola Razr 40 and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Motorola Razr 40 by 81.7% in our overall performance rating.
Motorola Razr 40
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (99/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (78/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (92/100 vs 34/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (73/100 vs 35/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 by 33 points (89/100 vs 56/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 40 has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 50/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 40 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.