Motorola Razr 2023 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Motorola Razr 2023 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 61/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,757,044); the Motorola Razr 2023 is noticeably lighter (184g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 2023
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Motorola Razr 2023 better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 184g vs 309g
- Better display (89/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (53/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1757044
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 40W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 76/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 27/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 2023 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 8 points higher (69/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 2023 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (89/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Motorola Razr 2023 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 2023 (63/100 vs 27/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 2023 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (53/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 2023 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1757044 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2004 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5311 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" Foldable AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 40W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 88.4×74.0×15.1 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 2023
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 2023
- 6.7" Foldable AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 2023
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 40W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 2023 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Motorola Razr 2023 by 40.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 2023
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 2023 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (89/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Motorola Razr 2023 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 2023 (63/100 vs 27/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 2023 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (53/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 2023 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Motorola Razr 2023 by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 2023 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr 2023 has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 2023 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 2023 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr 2023 is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.