Vivo V40 vs Vivo Y200 GT
The Vivo V40 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, while the Vivo Y200 GT (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo V40 leads — 64/100 vs 58/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y200 GT has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5500).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo V40
Vivo Y200 GT
What makes Vivo V40 better?
- Lighter: 190g vs 194g
- Better camera (60/100 vs 32/100)
- Better portability (69/100 vs 63/100)
What makes Vivo Y200 GT better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5500 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 62/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo V40 vs the Vivo Y200 GT, the Vivo V40 scores 6 points higher (64/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo V40 leads (60/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 59/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo Y200 GT is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo V40 notably outperforms the Vivo Y200 GT (60/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 GT and the Vivo V40 are nearly equal (63/100 vs 62/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo V40 is a bit better (69/100 vs 63/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo V40 | Vivo Y200 GT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 1027925 | 1027925 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1131 | 1131 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3111 | 3111 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5500 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.0×7.6 mm | 163.7×75.9×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo V40
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo Y200 GT
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Vivo V40
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y200 GT
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo V40
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y200 GT
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo V40 and Vivo Y200 GT, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 59/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y200 GT is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo V40 notably outperforms the Vivo Y200 GT (60/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 GT and the Vivo V40 are nearly equal (63/100 vs 62/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo V40 is a bit better (69/100 vs 63/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo V40 or the Vivo Y200 GT?
The Vivo V40 edges out the Vivo Y200 GT by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo V40 and the Vivo Y200 GT?
The Vivo V40 has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Vivo Y200 GT — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo V40 or the Vivo Y200 GT?
The Vivo V40 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 32/100).
Should you choose the Vivo V40 over the Vivo Y200 GT?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is camera — better on the Vivo V40 (60/100 vs 32/100).