Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro vs Vivo Y200 GT
The Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, while the Vivo Y200 GT (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y200 GT leads — 58/100 vs 56/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y200 GT has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5500); the Vivo Y200 GT is faster in AnTuTu (1,027,925 vs 1,015,447); the Vivo Y200 GT has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro
Vivo Y200 GT
What makes Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro better?
- Lighter: 185g vs 194g
- Better camera (35/100 vs 32/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 63/100)
What makes Vivo Y200 GT better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1027925 vs 1015447
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5500 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 62/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro vs the Vivo Y200 GT, the Vivo Y200 GT scores 2 points higher (58/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 59/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo Y200 GT notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro and the Vivo Y200 GT are nearly equal (35/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 GT and the Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro are nearly equal (63/100 vs 62/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro | Vivo Y200 GT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 1015447 | 1027925 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1131 | 1131 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3111 | 3111 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2392 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5500 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 163.7×75.0×8.0 mm | 163.7×75.9×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 185 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y200 GT
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y200 GT
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y200 GT
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro and Vivo Y200 GT, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y200 GT leads Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro by 1.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 59/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y200 GT notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro (94/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro and the Vivo Y200 GT are nearly equal (35/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 GT and the Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro are nearly equal (63/100 vs 62/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro or the Vivo Y200 GT?
The Vivo Y200 GT edges out the Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro and the Vivo Y200 GT?
The Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Vivo Y200 GT — 58/100.
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro over the Vivo Y200 GT?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Vivo Y200 GT (94/100 vs 79/100).