Motorola Moto X50 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Motorola Moto X50 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 78/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,797,821); the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (197g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto X50 Ultra
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Motorola Moto X50 Ultra better?
- Faster charging: 125W vs 90W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 197g vs 226g
- Better display (93/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1797821
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 5179
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4500 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 87/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 69/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 10 points higher (88/100 vs 78/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 75/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra (94/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 87/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 69/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Moto X50 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1797821 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1923 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5179 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" P-OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1220x2712 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 125W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.1×72.4×8.6 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 197 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto X50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Moto X50 Ultra
- 6.7" P-OLED
- Resolution: 1220x2712
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto X50 Ultra
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 125W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Moto X50 Ultra and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Motorola Moto X50 Ultra by 46.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Moto X50 Ultra
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra (94/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 87/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 69/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Moto X50 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 87/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Moto X50 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.