Motorola Moto X50 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Motorola Moto X50 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 78/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,797,821); the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (197g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Moto X50 Ultra

Performance 75
Display 93
Camera 87
Battery 69
Portability 54
Value for money —

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Motorola Moto X50 Ultra better?

  • Faster charging: 125W vs 100W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
  • Lighter: 197g vs 230g

  • Better display (93/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better portability (54/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1797821
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1923
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5179
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4500 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 87/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 69/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 13 points higher (91/100 vs 78/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 87/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra (85/100 vs 69/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).

Motorola Moto X50 Ultra: The Motorola Moto X50 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Moto X50 Ultra Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1797821 4247433
Geekbench Single 1923 3639
Geekbench Multi 5179 11047
Display 6.7" P-OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1220x2712 3168x1440
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4500 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 125W 100W
Wireless charging 50W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 64 MP 200 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2500 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 161.1×72.4×8.6 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 197 g 230 g
Launch price — $950

Camera comparison

Motorola Moto X50 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Moto X50 Ultra

  • 6.7" P-OLED
  • Resolution: 1220x2712
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
93
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Moto X50 Ultra

  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 125W
  • Wireless: 50W
69
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto X50 Ultra and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto X50 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
78/100
1797821 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +57.7%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Moto X50 Ultra by 57.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Moto X50 Ultra

Price unknown

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra (99/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 87/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra (85/100 vs 69/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Motorola Moto X50 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 87/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Motorola Moto X50 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.