Google Pixel 4a vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Google Pixel 4a (2020) runs on the Snapdragon 730G, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $349 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 41/100 (a 50-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3140); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 533,630); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 100); the Google Pixel 4a is noticeably lighter (143g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 4a by 50 points (91/100 vs 41/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 4a
Performance 42
Display 59
Camera 42
Battery 12
Portability 81
Value for money 22
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Google Pixel 4a better?
  • Lighter: 143g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $349 vs $950

  • Better portability (81/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 533630
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 697
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1809
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3140 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 42/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 12/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 59/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 4a vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 50 points higher (91/100 vs 41/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 12/100). Value score: Google Pixel 4a — 22/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 4a (99/100 vs 42/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 4a (89/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 4a (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 4a (85/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 4a significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (81/100 vs 39/100).

Google Pixel 4a: The Google Pixel 4a is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 4a Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Snapdragon 730G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 533630 4247433
Geekbench Single 697 3640
Geekbench Multi 1809 11033
Display 5.8" OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1080x2340 3168x1440
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3140 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 18W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 100 170
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 10 Android 16
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69
Dimensions 144.0×69.4×8.2 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 143 g 230 g
Launch price $349 $950
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 4a
  • Main: 12MP f/f/1.7
  • Front: 8MP
42
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 4a
  • 5.8" OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
59
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 4a
  • 3140 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
12
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 4a and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 4a Snapdragon 730G
41/100
533630 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +87.4%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Google Pixel 4a by 87.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel 4a
$349
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Launch price difference: $601. Google Pixel 4a was $601 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 4a (99/100 vs 42/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 4a (89/100 vs 59/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 4a (96/100 vs 42/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 4a (85/100 vs 12/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 4a significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (81/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 4a or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 4a by 50 points (91/100 vs 41/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 4a and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 4a has a MobileRank rating of 41/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 4a or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 42/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 4a or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 42/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 4a over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 4a is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.