Google Pixel 4a vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Google Pixel 4a (2020) runs on the Snapdragon 730G, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $349 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 41/100 (a 48-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 3140); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 533,630); the Google Pixel 4a is noticeably lighter (143g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 4a by 48 points (89/100 vs 41/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 4a
Performance 42
Display 59
Camera 42
Battery 12
Portability 81
Value for money 22
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 90
What makes Google Pixel 4a better?
  • Lighter: 143g vs 227g
  • Cheaper at launch: $349 vs $799

  • Better portability (81/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 533630
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 697
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1809
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 3140 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 42/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 12/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 59/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 4a vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 48 points higher (89/100 vs 41/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 12/100). Value score: Google Pixel 4a — 22/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 90/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 4a (99/100 vs 42/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 4a (99/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 4a (78/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 4a (92/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 4a significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (81/100 vs 35/100).

Google Pixel 4a: The Google Pixel 4a is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 4a Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor Snapdragon 730G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 533630 4602290
Geekbench Single 697 3640
Geekbench Multi 1809 11033
Display 5.8" OLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340 1440x3168
Refresh rate 60 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 3140 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 18W 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 100
Main camera 12 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 10 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 144.0×69.4×8.2 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 143 g 227 g
Launch price $349 $799
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 4a
  • Main: 12MP f/f/1.7
  • Front: 8MP
42
camera
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 4a
  • 5.8" OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
59
display
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 4a
  • 3140 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
12
battery
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 4a and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 4a Snapdragon 730G
41/100
533630 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +88.4%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Google Pixel 4a by 88.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel 4a
$349
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
$799

Launch price difference: $450. Google Pixel 4a was $450 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 4a (99/100 vs 42/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 4a (99/100 vs 59/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 4a (78/100 vs 42/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 4a (92/100 vs 12/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 4a significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (81/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 4a or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 4a by 48 points (89/100 vs 41/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 4a and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 4a has a MobileRank rating of 41/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 4a or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 42/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 4a or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 42/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 4a over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 4a is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.