Google Pixel 8a vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Google Pixel 8a (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $499 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 65/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4492); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,433,693); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 136); the Google Pixel 8a is noticeably lighter (188g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8a by 26 points (91/100 vs 65/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 8a

Performance 70
Display 82
Camera 70
Battery 39
Portability 57
Value for money 52

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Google Pixel 8a better?

  • Lighter: 188g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $950

  • Better portability (57/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1433693
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1722
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4458
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4492 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 7W

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 82/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 8a vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 26 points higher (91/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Google Pixel 8a — 52/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (96/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (85/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 8a notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (57/100 vs 39/100).

Google Pixel 8a: The Google Pixel 8a is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 8a Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Google Tensor G3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1433693 4247433
Geekbench Single 1722 3639
Geekbench Multi 4458 11047
Display 6.1" OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2400x1080 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4492 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 18W 100W
Wireless charging 7W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 136 170
Main camera 64 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2000 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP67 IP69
Dimensions 152.1×72.7×8.9 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 188 g 230 g
Launch price $499 $950

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 8a

  • Main: 64MP f/1.89
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 13MP
70
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 8a

  • 6.1" OLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 8a

  • 4492 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • Wireless: 7W
39
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 8a and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3
65/100
1433693 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +66.2%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Google Pixel 8a by 66.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 8a

$499

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $451. Google Pixel 8a was $451 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (99/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (96/100 vs 70/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (85/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 8a notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (57/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 8a or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8a by 26 points (91/100 vs 65/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 8a and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 8a has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 8a or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 70/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 8a or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 8a over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 8a is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.