Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (2026) runs on the Tensor G6, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 63/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4806); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,951,408); the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold is thinner (5.0mm vs 8.2mm).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold by 28 points (91/100 vs 63/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold

Performance 83
Display 78
Camera 37
Battery 49
Portability 52
Value for money —

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold better?


  • Better portability (52/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1951408
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2755
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 7563
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4806 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Lighter: 230g vs 239g

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 83/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 37/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 49/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 78/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 28 points higher (91/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold: The Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Tensor G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1951408 4247433
Geekbench Single 2755 3639
Geekbench Multi 7563 11047
Display 8.0" Foldable OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2076x2152 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4806 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 30W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 48 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 10 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 200 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 17 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 155.2×150.4×5.0 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 239 g 230 g
Launch price — $950

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold

  • Main: 48MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 10MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
37
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold

  • 8.0" Foldable OLED
  • Resolution: 2076x2152
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold

  • 4806 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 15W
49
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold Tensor G6
63/100
1951408 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +54.1%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold by 54.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold

Price unknown

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (99/100 vs 83/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (96/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (85/100 vs 49/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold by 28 points (91/100 vs 63/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 83/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.