Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1099 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 74/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5060); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,672,795); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 160).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro XL better?
- Lighter: 221g vs 230g
- Better portability (41/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1672795
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1900
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5200
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5060 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 37W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 23W
- Cheaper at launch: $950 vs $1099
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 74/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 88/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 57/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 86/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 17 points higher (91/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 74/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 57/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro XL — 58/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (99/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL are nearly equal (89/100 vs 86/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 88/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (85/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (41/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1672795 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1900 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5200 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2992x1344 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5060 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 37W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 23W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 160 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 42 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×76.6×8.5 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 221 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
- Main: 50MP f/1.68
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 48MP
- Front: 42MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
- 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2992x1344
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
- 5060 mAh
- Wired: 37W
- Wireless: 23W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Google Pixel 9 Pro XL by 60.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $149. Vivo X300 Ultra was $149 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (99/100 vs 74/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL are nearly equal (89/100 vs 86/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 88/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (85/100 vs 57/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (41/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 88/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 74/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.