Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6; launch prices were $1099 and $840. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 74/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5060); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 1,672,795).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro XL better?
- Lighter: 221g vs 223g
- Better camera (88/100 vs 78/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 1672795
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 1900
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 5200
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5060 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 37W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 23W
- Cheaper at launch: $840 vs $1099
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 74/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 57/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 86/100)
- Better portability (42/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 15 points higher (89/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads (88/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 57/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro XL — 58/100, Vivo iQOO 16 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (100/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 86/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a bit better (88/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (90/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 and the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL are nearly equal (42/100 vs 41/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 1672795 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1900 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5200 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2992x1344 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5060 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 37W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 23W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 160 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 42 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×76.6×8.5 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 221 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $840 |
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
- Main: 50MP f/1.68
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 48MP
- Front: 42MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
- 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2992x1344
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
- 5060 mAh
- Wired: 37W
- Wireless: 23W
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Google Pixel 9 Pro XL by 69.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $259. Vivo iQOO 16 was $259 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (100/100 vs 74/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 86/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a bit better (88/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (90/100 vs 57/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 and the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL are nearly equal (42/100 vs 41/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads on camera score (88/100 vs 78/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 74/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.